Nissan Juke Nismo: Hot hatch group test

It might not be a hot hatch in the traditional sense, but the Nissan Juke Nismo shouldn't be dismissed so quickly

From the smallest to the tallest. Hop up into the Juke Nismo and it all starts rather well; the steering wheel feels great and has soft Alcantara in the right places (although you can’t adjust the reach), the seats are comfy and there’s a manual gearbox to play with. You also have a wonderfully commanding view out, with two little transparent frogeye domes protruding from the bonnet in front of you.

Just as the Mini shares an engine with the 208, so the Juke shares its four cylinders with the Clio, and it’s certainly quick enough down the road. However, where the Clio (which has a different inlet manifold, turbo and ECU) sounds purposeful and has myriad burbles, chuffs and parps to make you smile, the Nissan sounds terrible. It has no bass – despite an exhaust the size of the Channel Tunnel – just a nasal whine like a particularly boring washing machine.

Subscribe to evo magazine

Subscribe today to have every issue of evo delivered straight to you. You'll SAVE 39% on the shop price, and get evo for its original cover price for a whole year!

Much more encouraging is the high vantage point you get of the road ahead. It gives you a feeling of unstoppability that makes you want to monster apexes and climb all over the verges like you’re in a rally car. Body roll is actually well contained too, but there’s no disguising the higher centre of gravity or the huge travel hidden in those cartoonish arches – the end result is a car that lacks any precision as soon as you try to hustle it. With its square-looking wheelbase you initially think that you might be able to get it set up nicely for corners if you turn in on the brakes, but the reality is that the rear just feels inert and unwilling to follow the front. If you’re aggressive with the throttle in a corner, traction also becomes a major issue as the lolloping suspension struggles to keep both front tyres in contact with the ground, although to its credit it never simply washes wide, so it’s not too terrifying on the narrower stuff…


Engine In-line 4-cyl, 1618cc, turbo
Power 197bhp @ 6000rpm
Torque 184lb ft @ 2400-4800rpm
Transmission Six-speed manual gearbox, front-wheel drive
Front suspension MacPherson struts, coil springs, dampers, anti-roll bar
Rear suspension Torsion beam, coil springs, dampers, anti-roll bar
Brakes 296mm ventilated front discs, 292mm solid rear discs, ABS, EBD, Brake Assist
Wheels 7 x 18in front and rear
Tyres 225/45 R18 front and rear
Weight (kerb) 1306kg (claimed)
Power-to-weight 153bhp/ton
0-62mph 7.8sec (claimed)
Top speed 134mph (claimed)
Basic price £20,395

Most Popular


Gordon Murray Automotive T.50 revealed – the real McLaren F1 successor

Gordon Murray’s T.50 is the pinnacle of supercar engineering on the eve of an electrified future
4 Aug 2020

BMW M3 GTS vs Mini GP vs Renault Sport Mégane R26.R

You could spend £250,000 on a 700bhp hardcore machine, but is there just as much fun to be had – if not more – with less power and for less outlay?
1 Aug 2020
Ford Focus RS

Mountune Ford Focus RS M520 2020 review – less hot hatch, more Group B throwback

The idea of a 500-horse Focus won’t be for everyone, but for the rest it’s a glorious dose of internal combustion madness
31 Jul 2020

BMW M2 CS 2020 review – there's plenty to worry a Porsche Cayman GT4

The most enjoyable and rewarding M car to drive for quite some time. Potentially, a future classic.
31 Jul 2020