Audi RS5 vs BMW M4 vs Mercedes-AMG C63 S - Supertest review - The data

The Audi RS5 meets its arch rivals, the BMW M4 Competition Pack and the Mercedes-AMG C63 S for an evo supertest.

The data

To Millbrook for the acceleration and braking tests – and a potentially embarrassing weigh-in

Parked at the start of the Millbrook mile straight, the C63’s engine is settled to a low, purposeful idle that hints heavily at the performance potential. Pull both aluminium gearshift paddles towards you to engage the launch mode, then tap the right one briefly to confirm you’re ready. Plant your left foot on the brake and your right foot on the throttle and wait for the V8 to start bellowing and crackling at a preset 3500rpm before side-stepping the brake and letting the computers do the rest.

Subscribe to evo magazine

Subscribe today to have every issue of evo delivered straight to you. You'll SAVE 39% on the shop price, and get evo for its original cover price for a whole year!

It sounds easy, but in reality getting the rear-wheel-drive Mercedes off the line takes practice. Selecting the traction control’s halfway-house Sport setting and carefully feathering the throttle helps the C63 roar to 60mph in 4.3sec, which is a few tenths behind Merc’s claim of 3.9sec to 62 but an impressive achievement when you consider the C63 tips our scales at a portly 1847kg.

The carbonfibre-roofed M4 is far trimmer, weighing in at just 1645kg. This helps explain why it’s just a tenth slower to 60mph than the C63, despite a 59bhp power deficit. That’s about as big as the gap gets between these two, and remarkably they both flash past 150mph in 21.1sec. Launch control is standard, but as in the Mercedes it’s tricky to get the BMW off the line. You can alter the starting revs up to a maximum of 4000rpm, but even then the M4 feels like it’s bogging down on Millbrook’s track surface, possibly explaining why that 0-60mph time is four tenths behind BMW’s 0-62 claim.

No such worries for the Audi. Yes, it weighs a not insubstantial 1799kg, but four-wheel-drive traction and a gearbox that features eight closely stacked ratios allow it to erupt off the line without wasting a single horsepower. As in the M4 and C63 S, there’s launch control, yet unlike in those two, the Audi’s system is brutally effective. Out of the corner of my eye I can see the head of deputy editor and today's designated ballast Adam Towler being flung back against his headrest as the RS5 catapults off the line like a fighter jet being fired down the deck of an aircraft carrier. The result is 60mph in a laugh-out-loud 3.6sec. Audi modestly claims 3.9sec to 62.

However, the Audi’s mass and weaker top end tell eventually and beyond 100mph it starts to lose ground to the other two. By 150mph it’s a full two seconds in arrears.

Our braking test features ten consecutive stops from 100mph, which is enough to put even high-performance setups under strain. The Merc’s optional carbon-ceramics give the impression of refusing to wilt, the pedal action remaining resolutely firm. However, the data shows a 21.5-metre difference between the best and the worst stop – the largest spread here. The C63 also records the longest stopping distance, by over 5 metres.

The lighter BMW, on standard cast-iron brakes, stops in the shortest length, recording 86.5 metres early on – 1.6 metres better than the Merc’s best. However, during the eighth stop the pedal begins to go long and wisps of smoke rise from the under-pressure pads. The Audi’s brakes – also cast-iron – suffer the same symptoms at about the same time, but unlike the BMW, the RS5’s pedal feel and brake bite are fully recovered by the time we hit the road again.

Audi RS5

BMW M4 Comp Pack

Mercedes-AMG C63 S


V6, 2894cc, twin-turbo

Straight-six, 2979cc, twin-turbo

V8, 3982cc, twin-turbo


444bhp @ 5700-6700rpm

444bhp @ 7000rpm

503bhp @ 5500-6250rpm


442 lb ft @ 1900-5000rpm

406lb ft @ 1850-5000rpm

516lb ft @ 1750-4500rpm


Eight-speed auto, four-wheel drive, electronically controlled rear LSD

Seven-speed dual-clutch (option), rear-wheel drive, LSD

Seven-speed MCT auto, rear-wheel drive, electronically controlled LSD


275/30 R20 front, 275/30 R20 rear, Hankook Ventus S1 Evo 2

255/35 R19 front, 275/35 R19 rear, Michelin Pilot Super Sport

255/40 R19 front, 285/35 R20 rear, Michelin Pilot Super Sport






1799kg as tested (1655kg claimed)

1645kg as tested (1585kg claimed)

1847kg as tested (1725kg claimed)


251bhp/ton using test-car weight, (273bhp/ton claimed)

274bhp/ton using test-car weight (285bhp/ton claimed)

277bhp/ton using test-car weight (296bhp/ton claimed)


3.6sec as tested (3.9 to 62 claimed)

4.4sec as tested (4.0 to 62 claimed)

4.3sec as tested (3.9 to 62 claimed)

Top speed

174mph (optional raised limiter)

155mph (limited)

155mph (limited)

evo mpg

19.6 (average over duration of test)

21.2 (average over duration of test)

16.5 (average over duration of test)

Basic price




PCP monthly price

£833 (36 months, £8000 deposit, 10,000 miles per annum limit)

£861 (36 months, £8000 deposit, 10,000 miles per annum limit)

£902 (36 months, £8000 deposit, 10,000 miles per annum limit)

Most Popular

BMW M3 saloon

All-new BMW M3 Competition revealed – an icon reborn

This is the all-new BMW M3 Competition saloon which will join the M4 Competition coupe in BMW M’s new M3/4 family
23 Sep 2020
Honda Civic Type-R hatchback

Honda Civic Type R GT 2020 review – still king of the hot hatch crop?

Subtle tweaks have made the Type R an even more formidable hot hatch, but we’re keen to try one again soon to understand fully the changes to the susp…
22 Sep 2020

All-new BMW M4 Competition revealed – next generation super coupe debuts

The new BMW M4 Competition applies its war paint, but there’s no manual coming to the UK
23 Sep 2020
Hyundai i30 N

Updated Hyundai i30 N revealed with optional dual-clutch ‘box

It was the hot hatch that upset the status quo, and now the i30 N is back with more power and tech
24 Sep 2020