Skip advert
Advertisement

Toyota C-HR review - Entertaining Qashqai alternative - Toyota C-HR engine and transmission

Lacks the performance to do justice to a capable chassis, but there's still plenty to like about the C-HR

Evo rating
Price
from £21,065
  • Impressive ride/handling balance, clever rev-matching tech
  • Engines lack performance and enthusiasm, claustrophobic rear cabin

Engine and transmission

There are three drivetrains available in the C-HR: A 1.2-litre turbocharged four-cylinder petrol with six-speed manual and continuously-variable transmission options, and a 1.8-litre four-cylinder hybrid, again supplied with a CVT.

The hybrid isn’t as unenthusiastic as you might expect, having benefitted from years of development within Toyota to the point that it no longer moos quite as loudly under heavy acceleration, though it’s still not the performance option in the range. Its benefit, of course, is low fuel consumption and low emissions, which have corresponding benefits when it comes to fuelling and taxing the car.

The four-cylinder unit uses Atkinson-cycle combustion technology, which delays closing of the intake valves to reduce the effective compression ratio to extract more efficiency from the combustion process. This reduces power (on its own, the 1.8-litre lump pushes out only 97bhp), but that’s where the C-HR’s electric motor comes in, boosting power and low-down torque for a combined 120bhp.

Advertisement - Article continues below

That’s slightly more than the 1.2-litre (fashionably downsized) four-pot turbo petrol, which develops 113bhp at 5600rpm and 136lb ft of torque from 1500rpm, though the two power units boast nearly identical on-paper acceleration figures. This engine too has a strong focus on efficiency and refinement over performance, using variable valve timing, a high compression ratio, direct injection, and an exhaust manifold integrated into the cylinder head. The VVT system allows Atkinson-cycle running just like the hybrid, though when more performance is called for it can switch back to the traditional Otto cycle.

 

Skip advert
Advertisement
Skip advert
Advertisement

Most Popular

McLaren Artura Spider 2024 review – Ferrari 296 rival just got a whole lot better
McLaren Artura Spider
Reviews

McLaren Artura Spider 2024 review – Ferrari 296 rival just got a whole lot better

More power, comprehensive chassis updates and a new Spider model has resulted in McLaren’s Artura being impossible to ignore for those in the junior s…
16 Jun 2024
Lotus Elise S2 v Toyota MR2 Mk3 v Porsche Boxster S 987: The best affordable mid-engined sports cars
Used mid-engined bargains
Group tests

Lotus Elise S2 v Toyota MR2 Mk3 v Porsche Boxster S 987: The best affordable mid-engined sports cars

Everyone should own a mid-engined car at least once in their life, and the S2 Elise, Mk3 MR2 and 987 Boxster S are brilliant places to start
15 Jun 2024
Ferrari F430 v Lamborghini Gallardo v McLaren 650S v Audi R8: The best used mid-engined supercars
Affordable mid engined exotics
Group tests

Ferrari F430 v Lamborghini Gallardo v McLaren 650S v Audi R8: The best used mid-engined supercars

For most of us, owning a mid-engined supercar is the ultimate. And because of the numbers built in the last 20 years, the dream is more attainable tha…
16 Jun 2024