Skip advert
Advertisement

Nissan Juke 1.6 DiG-T Tekna 4x4 CVT review

We drive the top spec Nissan Juke, with 4WD, a 187bhp 1.6 turbo engine and a CVT gearbox

Evo rating
  • Fun to look at and drive
  • Manual front-driver a better choice

What is it? The Nissan Juke, a supermini-cum-SUV-cum-coupe, if you believe the hype. This is the top-spec car, with a 1.6-litre turbocharged petrol engine, four-wheel drive and a CVT gearbox. It costs £20,345. Technical highlights? The 1.6 DiG-T (direct injection, turbocharged) engine boasts 187bhp and 177lb ft of torque while achieving 37mpg and 175g/km. Some sources have rumoured that a similar engine will make an appearance in the next Renaultsport Clio. There’s also Nissan’s ‘All-Mode 4x4-i’ all-wheel-drive system, which gets lateral torque vectoring. As well as splitting torque front and rear, with up to 50 per cent being sent to the back wheels, the split can also be made side-to-side across the rear axle. By monitoring vehicle speed, wheel speed, gear position, steering angle, lateral G-forces and the car’s yaw rate, torque distribution to the outside rear wheel can be increased in corners to cut understeer and help the car round. Half of the engine’s total available torque can be sent to either rear wheel. What’s it like to drive? It’s good fun. While weighing the best part of a ton and a half, the Juke feels light on its feet, and the light but darty steering gives it similar responses to some of the best warm hatchbacks. The high ground clearance and light pedals mean it’s not dripping in feel and feedback, but there’s enough interaction to please most keen drivers. The four-wheel-drive system, while admirably clever on paper, seems unnecessary: a front-driven Juke we’ve driven with the same engine felt incredibly similar dynamically. That car also offers a six-speed manual gearbox; this 4wd model is hamstrung by its only transmission choice, a CVT automatic. While far from the worst example of its breed, the manual mode isn’t perfect and with the Juke’s gimmicky Dynamic Control System set to Sport, the car holds on to revs and greets you with that stereotypical CVT drone. With every other element feeling pretty good, you’re left crying for a simple manual. The engine is impressive, with plenty of torque where you need it and refinement when you want it, but again it feels a little suffocated by the gearbox. How does it compare? The Juke looks bigger than it actually is, and if you want something practical and SUV-like, this ain’t the car to come to. It feels more like a rival to the Mini Cooper, Alfa Romeo Mito, Citroen DS3 et al, selling on its looks and feel-good factor. And if you’re a fan of the former it provides plenty of the latter. Anything else I should know? While the most technically interesting and dynamically promising Juke of the lot, this is absolutely the range’s minority seller. Just three per cent of Jukes are expected to leave the showroom in this trim. The nearly £3K cheaper fwd manual 1.6 DiG-T is just as much fun and, by virtue of its superior gearbox, more likeable too.

Specifications

EngineIn-line 4cyl, 1618cc, turbo
Max power187bhp @ 5600rpm
Max torque177lb ft @ 2000-5200rpm
0-608.4sec (claimed 0-62)
Top speed124mph
Skip advert
Advertisement
Skip advert
Advertisement

Most Popular

Saab PhoeniX – dead on arrival
Saab PhoeniX
Features

Saab PhoeniX – dead on arrival

The Swedish brand’s failed 2010s revival meant we missed out on a 400bhp hybrid TT rival – and more
11 Jul 2024
The new Audi A5 has been revealed, but it's not what you think
New Audi A5 – front
News

The new Audi A5 has been revealed, but it's not what you think

A new naming structure means that Audi's A4 saloon and estate have adopted the A5 badge, with the new S5 packing a 362bhp V6
16 Jul 2024
BMW M3 CS v Litchfield BMW M2: which makes the better track car?
BMW M3 CS v Litchfield BMW M2 – front
Group tests

BMW M3 CS v Litchfield BMW M2: which makes the better track car?

BMW's latest and greatest M3 takes on Litchfield's 640bhp tuned M2 around Cadwell Park
13 Jul 2024