Caterham Seven 160 vs Morgan 3 Wheeler track video

Turbo Caterham Seven 160 takes on quirky Morgan 3 Wheeler in our latest track battle video

Our latest track battle sees the Caterham Seven 160 take on the Morgan 3 Wheeler at Mallory Park.

The pair of British sports cars look underendowed on paper, sharing just five cylinders, seven wheels and less than three litres of engine capacity between them. But with bags of character and half the mass of your average city car, they can punch well above their weight when it comes to sheer grin factor.

Subscribe to evo magazine

Subscribe today to our exclusive new offer and SAVE 39% on the shop price, get evo for its original cover price of £3.00 an issue, plus get a FREE gift worth £20!

The Caterham Seven is a very familiar face. In production for more than 40 years now (longer if you look back to its Lotus Seven forebear), ‘Seven’ has been a byword for basic sports car fun for a long time now. Sold as either a kit car or fully built, and with all manner of engines that take its performance from beginners’ level to Bugatti Veyron-rivaling acceleration figures, it’s as famous for its flexibility as its fun.

The 160 model is the new entry point into the range, and for the first time a factory Seven gets a turbocharger. A dinky 660cc three-cylinder turbo comes from Suzuki, serving up 80bhp and 79lb ft of torque – power akin to a VW Up. A wee 490kg kerb weight ensures performance is still brisk, though, 0-60mph taking 6.5sec. While a 100mph top speed won’t win games of Top Trumps, it’s clearly more than enough to have fun on British B-roads – especially when you consider the modest grip of its tyres. Prices start at £17,995.

Advertisement
Advertisement - Article continues below

The Morgan 3 Wheeler is as quirky as its name suggests, with two skinny 19in wire wheels up front and a fatter, single driven wheel at the rear. Strapped to the front, causing havoc for the handling balance, is a V-twin motorbike-sourced engine delivering 80bhp and 103lb ft. At 525kg the Morgan is the heavier of our pair, yet its 0-60 time is quicker, at 6.0sec, and its top speed 15mph healthier. It’s pricier, at £30,000.

Of course, there’s one very visible factor that ensures their dynamic behaviour is contrasting, and a fascinating track battle is ensured. Which is quicker? And perhaps more pertinently, which is more fun? Video above…

Advertisement
Advertisement

Most Popular

Visit/porsche/911-turbo/202379/new-porsche-911-turbo-gains-lightweight-and-sport-packages
Porsche 911 Turbo

New Porsche 911 Turbo gains Lightweight and Sport packages 

The 2020 Porsche 911 Turbo hasn’t been with us for long, but a raft of packages and optional extras are already in the pipeline
26 Mar 2020
Visit/land-rover/defender/202375/new-land-rover-defender-x-p400-review
Land Rover Defender

New Land Rover Defender X P400 review

Land Rover’s all new Defender proves to be worth the wait and is now as capable on road as it is off it. It’s no driver’s car but as a do everything m…
25 Mar 2020
Visit/corvette/202016/1200bhp-hennessey-c8-corvette-shown-testing-on-video
Corvette

1200bhp Hennessey C8 Corvette shown testing on video

The C8 Corvette has only just hit showrooms, but Hennessey Performance already has big plans...
26 Mar 2020
Visit/hyundai/i30-n-hatchback/201775/hyundai-i30-n-versus-hyundai-i30-tcr
Hyundai i30 N hatchback

Hyundai i30 N versus Hyundai i30 TCR

Can Dickie Meaden beat Steve Sutcliffe in a straight(ish) race? We sent them to the Circuit Nuvolari with a pair of Hyundai i30 Ns to find out.
20 Sep 2019