In-depth reviews

Audi Q3 2019 review – just another compact SUV, but one with potential

The Audi Q3 is not a bad car, but it's lacking in key areas compared to strong rivals, while short of the quality you’d expect

Evo rating
  • Agile and spritely on-road dynamics, reasonably space efficient
  • Dull interior, lethargic powertrains, not special enough for its crowded segment

It seems the compact premium SUV has become the new holy grail for modern manufacturers. Almost everyone is playing the game, and while Audi may have arrived in this space early with the original Q3, brand loyalty in this segment is meaningless against image and trend.

You’d expect that the new Q3 would need to do more than merely build on its predecessor’s foundations to compete, then. Traditional rivals such as the Range Rover Evoque and Volvo XC40 are stronger than ever – and with updraught mainstream rivals in the form of the Peugeot 3008 and Mazda CX-5 nipping at those proverbial heels, there is no space for the new Q3 to be average, let alone underwhelming.

Subscribe to evo magazine

Subscribe today to our exclusive new offer and SAVE 39% on the shop price, get evo for its original cover price of £3.00 an issue, plus get a FREE gift worth £20!

It might come as a disappointment to see that the Q3’s not been transformed or revolutionised, rather it’s simply been aligned to its specific sliver of market space so as to avoid getting too close to its multiple in-house SUV siblings. There is hope for the Q3, as we’re likely to see a new RSQ3 later in the car’s life cycle, something that Audi has not played coy about replacing with constant sightings of baritone and big-booted mules pounding laps around the Ring. But, for the moment, the question of how more cooking Q3 models perform remains the more pressing issue.

Audi Q3: in detail

Engine, transmission and technical details Drawn from the Volkswagen Group’s MQB collection, powertrains are adept if not especially refined or responsive – its general underpinnings are akin to that of an automotive groundhog day

Advertisement - Article continues below

Performance and 0-60 time Those ubiquitous underpinnings do have a pay-off though, namely a lithe kerb weight and acceptable performance numbers

Ride and handling Forgettable at low speeds, the Q3 wakes up when driven harder as load enters more forcefully through the chassis – it’s still no Golf GTI though

MPG and running costs All Q3s are reasonably frugal, and should be capable of matching their WLTP economy figures

Interior and tech Yet another underwhelming Audi interior, although outright build quality and interior tech remains strong, if not outstanding

Design A clunky combination of lines, creases and awkward junctions that don’t quite fit onto the Q3’s somewhat compact canvas

Prices, specs and rivals

Prices for the new Q3 start at just under £30k for the entry-level front-wheel-drive 35 TFSI with a manual transmission, and rise to over £45k for the fully loaded Vorsprung 45 TFSI quattro. All models are reasonably well equipped, with Audi’s MMI touch infotainment system, a basic set of digital instrument dials, 18-inch wheels and LED headlights standard.

Advertisement - Article continues below

S line and Vorsprung trim levels add a further £1800 and a hefty £9,690 to basic Sport model prices, although the latter does throw in the proverbial kitchen sink, with equipment highlights including 20-inch alloy wheels, matrix LED headlights, contrasting exterior paint finishes, Alcantara interior trim, a Bang and Olufsen hi-fi, added driver assistance elements and more.

> Click here for our review of the Volvo XC40

Rivals are priced on a par, with the equivalent Volvo XC40 and BMW X1 generally matching the Audi’s price point spec for spec, and the new Range Rover Evoque sitting slightly higher. Using a Q3 35 TDI S-Tronic model as a reference point at £34,860, the Volvo XC40 D3 R-Design comes in at £34,085, the BMW X1 18d M Sport at £35,695 and Range Rover Evoque D150 Auto at £36,615.

To play devil’s advocate, specify an Audi A4 S line Avant with the same powertrain and its larger cabin, bigger boot, superior interior and vastly more sophisticated chassis look to be awfully good value for just £1200 more. Consider the A4’s bump in standard equipment and that difference in value shrinks yet further.


Most Popular


Jaguar F-type R 2020 review

Entry-level P300 still has the sweetest F-type chassis, but the 567bhp R’s appeal is as enduring as ever
10 Feb 2020

Five of the best used V12 cars you can buy right now

For less than the price of a new Porsche 911, you could have a dozen cylinders at your disposal
4 Feb 2020

Porsche Macan GTS 2020 review

Porsche's mid-sized Macan GTS remains the most impressive SUV to drive with a tad more polish and tech
10 Feb 2020
Hyundai i30 N hatchback

Hyundai i30 N versus Hyundai i30 TCR

Can Dickie Meaden beat Steve Sutcliffe in a straight(ish) race? We sent them to the Circuit Nuvolari with a pair of Hyundai i30 Ns to find out.
20 Sep 2019