Long term tests

Fiat Panda 100HP

Official: Jeremy Clarkson wrong about Fiat Panda 100HP! (Well according to Richard Meaden, who disagrees that the Suzuki Swift Sport is better)

Fiat Panda 100HP

If any of you are regular readers of The Sunday Times then you may have stumbled upon a piece about the Panda 100HP by Jeremy Clarkson a month or so ago. He didn’t like it.

No doubt like most of you, I enjoy spending an hour on a Sunday evening watching three amusing and talented blokes arsing around in other people’s cars. It’s fun and it annoys the do-gooders, which has to be a good thing. However, JC’s Panda slagging really wound me up, because it was patently cobblers.

Subscribe to evo magazine

Subscribe today to have every issue of evo delivered straight to you. You'll SAVE 39% on the shop price, and get evo for its original cover price for a whole year!

The nub of his argument was that the Panda is extraordinarily noisy. In fact ‘there aren’t enough Nurofens in the world’ for him to attempt to hit the Panda’s claimed 115mph top speed. Come on, it’s a very small and highly-strung 1.4-litre car. If you wring its neck it makes a racket, but in no way is it ‘like putting a Saturn V rocket in your vacuum cleaner’, and when cruising at part throttle on the motorway at 85-90mph it’s fine.

Jeremy also reckons Fiat is charging £10K for a £7K car, which may be true, but every car company – with the possible exception of Bugatti, which loses money on every Veyron – builds a fat margin into its pricing. That’s why dealers can afford to discount. We paid only £8700 for our Fiat, and many of you have paid £8500 or less. Compared with Mini’s ‘lifestyle’ pricing, the Panda 100HP’s asking price is realistic.

Like us, JC is a big fan of the Suzuki Swift Sport. In fact he recommends buying one instead of the Panda. Only problem is that, even allowing for a similarly chunky discount on the Suzuki, it still costs a few grand more than the Fiat, which when you’re working to an £8K budget is quite a chunk of cash. Another minor detail is the Swift’s Group 9 insurance rating; the Panda is Group 5.

However, the final nail in the coffin was Clarkson’s assertion that the Panda ‘rides more smoothly than you might imagine’. It doesn’t. With every passing mile I’m realising that the ride is actually pretty awful.Who’s right and who’s wrong about the Panda 100HP? Add your two-penn’orth by emailing fastfleet@evo.co.uk

Running Costs

Date acquiredDecember 2006
Total mileage4,254
Costs this month£0
Mileage this month1,145
MPG this month42.4mpg

Most Popular

Hyundai i20 N revealed – 200bhp supermini ready for some Ford Fiesta ST baiting
Hyundai i20 hatchback

Hyundai i20 N revealed – 200bhp supermini ready for some Ford Fiesta ST baiting

Long-awaited second N division model set to shake up the junior hot hatch establishment
20 Oct 2020
£153,000 ​Alfa Romeo Giulia GTA enters final stages of development
Alfa Romeo Giulia Quadrifoglio

£153,000 ​Alfa Romeo Giulia GTA enters final stages of development

Alfa Romeo has put its F1 drivers behind the wheel of the Giulia GTA and GTAm ahead of production in 2021
20 Oct 2020
Is this a new Porsche 911 Safari?
Porsche 911 coupe

Is this a new Porsche 911 Safari?

Tall ride height and wheelarch extensions suggest a surprise 911 derivative could be coming
22 Oct 2020
Alpine to become high-performance Renault offshoot
Alpine

Alpine to become high-performance Renault offshoot

Heated-up Renaults but no A110 replacement for Alpine as it follows in Cupra and Abarth footsteps
21 Oct 2020