Skip advert
Advertisement

Mazda 3 review - talented family hatch, but lacks sparkle - Performance and 0-60 time

Mazda's C-segment contender should be taken seriously

Evo rating
Price
from £17,095
  • Good refinement, space, tech and diesel engine
  • Question mark about residual values, base models not so attractive

Until Mazda develops a new MPS model there's little of interest in the range when it comes to straight line performance, but against conventional mass-market rivals the Mazda3 fares well enough. It could be better, but for kerb weights that start from 1351kg - a good hundred kilograms heavier than basic models in several other manufacturers' ranges.

Advertisement - Article continues below

The slowest model is powered by the 1.5-litre petrol engine and though it never feels particularly tardy, its 10.8-second time for the 0-62mph sprint tells a story, one that involves just 99bhp and 111lb ft of torque. That engine isn't offered in the Fastback model.

The 118bhp variant of the 2.0-litre petrol engine is much quicker, at 8.9 seconds, but you need to use all of the rev counter to achieve that and the coarse engine note doesn't encourage such antics. It's considerably slower when paired with an automatic transmission too, posting a 10.4-second time. The Fastback can be had with that engine, and it's actually a tenth faster to 62mph for both transmissions, but it's the least impressive powertrain of the lot.

Mazda also offers a 163bhp version of the 2.0-litre petrol engine, which is more appealing at the top end than the lower-powered unit. It achieves a respectable 8.1-second 0-62mph time, but it has no more torque than the 118bhp unit so it too needs revs to get a wriggle on.

In contrast, the torquey 2.2-litre diesel effortlessly puts in an 8.1-second time and matches the petrol unit's 130mph top speed (eight seconds dead and 132mph for the Fastback) and in reality, for most drivers, it will be far quicker than the petrol units for more of the time, as it has a usable mid-range obviating the need for revs. That's just as well, as the diesel isn't as quiet as some rival powerplants. Its performance more than makes up for that though.

Skip advert
Advertisement
Skip advert
Advertisement

Most Popular

Lotus Elise S2 v Toyota MR2 Mk3 v Porsche Boxster S 987: The best affordable mid-engined sports cars
Used mid-engined bargains
Group tests

Lotus Elise S2 v Toyota MR2 Mk3 v Porsche Boxster S 987: The best affordable mid-engined sports cars

Everyone should own a mid-engined car at least once in their life, and the S2 Elise, Mk3 MR2 and 987 Boxster S are brilliant places to start
15 Jun 2024
McLaren Artura Spider 2024 review – Ferrari 296 rival just got a whole lot better
McLaren Artura Spider
Reviews

McLaren Artura Spider 2024 review – Ferrari 296 rival just got a whole lot better

More power, comprehensive chassis updates and a new Spider model has resulted in McLaren’s Artura being impossible to ignore for those in the junior s…
16 Jun 2024
Ferrari F430 v Lamborghini Gallardo v McLaren 650S v Audi R8: The best used mid-engined supercars
Affordable mid engined exotics
Group tests

Ferrari F430 v Lamborghini Gallardo v McLaren 650S v Audi R8: The best used mid-engined supercars

For most of us, owning a mid-engined supercar is the ultimate. And because of the numbers built in the last 20 years, the dream is more attainable tha…
16 Jun 2024