Alfa Romeo 4C Spider v Porsche Boxster Spyder - Spider decider - Alfa Romeo 4C Spider v Porsche Boxster Spyder - page 2

The 981 Boxster Spyder is one of our favourite sports cars, but Alfa Romeo's 4C spider is a tough car to resist. Or is it?

The roll is well managed, too; the 4C never completely falls away, the body finding support as it’s pushed and the roll contributing to the ample amounts of grip the 4C has to offer. In the dry, it will carry huge speeds into corners and has plenty of traction out of them, too. But finding the conviction to really commit is difficult. For a moment, just as you come off the brakes, you feel disconnected from the steering and you aren’t quite sure what the 4C is going to do: grip and turn in, or understeer. It’s only for a split second, but it’s enough to sap your confidence.

> Read our review of the Alfa Romeo Giulia Quadrifoglio

Subscribe to evo magazine

Subscribe today to have every issue of evo delivered straight to you. You'll SAVE 39% on the shop price, and get evo for its original cover price for a whole year!

But it’s the way the steering is constantly distracted that really undermines the Alfa. As Dan says: ‘The steering should be the highlight of that car and I could live with everything else – the really boosty engine, the slightly brittle ride, the ropey cabin – if it didn’t tramline so much. That’s what kills it for me.’

The Boxster Spyder is the yardstick against which all roadsters can be measured. And – as you may have guessed by now – the 4C Spider doesn’t even come close. The philosophy behind both cars is very similar: uncompromised, driver-focused, £60,000-ish mid-engine sports cars with elementary folding roofs. It’s just that the Porsche fulfils its brief so much better than the Alfa.

Advertisement
Advertisement - Article continues below

There’s cohesiveness to everything about the Boxster. Where the rather uncomfortable ride in the 4C feels at odds with the amount of roll and pitch, the Boxster’s chassis strikes just the right balance. The ride doesn’t settle until you get to 50mph, then it gains real fluidity. It remains relatively firm, but there’s enough pliancy for it not to be thrown around by bumps. There’s also very little roll, though not unnaturally so.

To feel you’re working the chassis you need to be pushing it hard. In a standard Boxster, the engine can feel heavy and – strangely, being a flat-six – rather high as the body rolls. The Spyder, however, keeps everything much more contained and under control. There’s never any unruly weight transfer. The impression is that all the weight is confined within the axles, the car pivoting around the driver.

The Spyder has the quicker steering rack from the 911 Turbo, but it’s not easy to gauge how much grip the front axle has. That’s mostly down to the front tyres being well within their limits on the road. The Spyder also lacks the energetic, physical and immediate front-end of the Cayman GT4, and won’t be goaded into oversteer quite as easily. But it always feels nimble and direct. You can turn in with absolute confidence, the steering’s response and the chassis’ poise in wonderful harmony.

> Porsche Cayman GT4 review - the ultimate drivers' Porsche

As soon as you’re on the throttle the limited-slip diff engages, the rear adopting attitude. It’s not oversteer that needs any sort of correction, but enough for you to know you can adjust your line and balance the car on the throttle. The process is wonderfully intuitive, the chassis’ transparency combining with the glorious howl of the engine to egg you on.

The Boxster Spyder isn’t perfect. The increase in capacity over the standard Boxster’s engine does make the annoyingly high gearing that plagues all 981 Boxsters and Caymans less of a problem. You no longer feel a need to change into first in tighter corners. However, lower gear ratios, or a lower final drive, would make it more enjoyable still. You’d be able to use the rear axle more, enjoy the Boxster’s balance better and exploit the diff more often. As it is, you need real commitment to reach the limit of the Boxster’s grip, more commitment than you can really employ on the road most of the time.

Advertisement - Article continues below

The Boxster Spyder’s ultimate grip, involvement and the intuitive nature of the whole driving experience puts it poles apart from the 4C Spider. Also, the Porsche’s sonorous flat-six doesn’t just sound better than the Alfa’s turbocharged four, but it’s more powerful, torquier, and its linear delivery makes it so much more gratifying to use. If it’s pure attention you crave, then the 4C Spider does trump the Boxster. However, the Alfa’s brittle ride, shoddy interior and dreary sound make it unpleasant even at low speed. And it’s not as if the Boxster doesn’t attract enough attention; it’s just not always the kind of attention you want.

Advertisement
Advertisement

Most Popular

Visit/news/20376/scuderia-cameron-glickenhaus-004s-order-books-open-for-674bhp-three-seater
News

Scuderia Cameron Glickenhaus 004S: order books open for 674bhp three-seater

Announced in 2017, the road-legal Scuderia Cameron Glickenhaus 004S is now set to enter production later this year
6 Aug 2020
Visit/bmw/2-series-coupe/202900/new-bmw-2-series-coupe-spied-ahead-of-reveal
BMW 2 Series coupe

New rear-wheel drive BMW 2-series coupe spied – the M2’s not dead yet

BMW’s 2-series Coupe is coming back, with right-wheel drive.
6 Aug 2020
Visit/best-cars/15315/best-cars-to-buy-for-ps20000-evo-garage
Best cars

Best cars to buy for £20,000 – evo garage

The evo team pick their favourite used performance cars
4 Aug 2020
Visit/ferrari/roma
Ferrari

Ferrari Roma 2020 review – a new take on the Italian GT

Direct, engaging handling and superb ride quality, plus strong performance: the sharp-suited Roma nails its GT brief
5 Aug 2020