Skip advert
Advertisement

Jaguar F-type – Dead on arrival

In the early noughties, Jaguar had a second stab at a successor to the iconic E-type, even proposing a V6 mid-engined Boxster rival. But once again it wasn’t to be

DOA has already covered Jaguar’s first doomed attempt to make an F-type (evo 268). Ford killed that car when it bought Jag, but it was on its watch that a second ill-fated attempt was conceived, first hinted at with the XK180 concept of 1998. Two years later that car’s design themes were evolved into another concept (below) and, to give a less subtle suggestion that Jaguar wanted back into the sports car game, it was labelled the F-type.

Advertisement - Article continues below

With low windscreens and diving bonnet lines, these show cars had no hope of making production, but behind the scenes work progressed on a front-engined, two-seater sports car you could actually buy. An important part of any new car project is to benchmark rival products, which for Jag’s engineers meant getting a Honda S2000… and then accidentally writing it off. Another S2000 was bought, and also promptly binned. While the engineers concentrated on keeping a third S2000 out of the barriers at Whitley roundabout, the designers wrestled with making the F-type concept into something road legal, under the stewardship of new design director Ian Callum.

> Jaguar XJ41 – Dead on arrival

The result was pretty but a little plain next to the flamboyantly rule-breaking concepts. Happily, there was then a major rethink as Jag decided that a true Boxster beater should carry its engine in the middle, just like the Porsche. So the sports car project was started again as a mid-engined car codenamed X600. Callum’s design team came up with a pretty XJ13-meets-Boxster look – seen here (above) for the first time outside of Jaguar – that lived up to the internal marketing documents that billed it as ‘a revolutionary and sexy Jaguar roadster’, while engineers created a sophisticated suspension design to match the brief of ‘uncompromising performance and handling that takes your breath away’.

Advertisement - Article continues below
Skip advert
Advertisement
Advertisement - Article continues below

Real-world testing of the chassis hardware began using Jag suspension fitted to a fleet of Honda NSXs. The shift in layout carried another layer of logic because in the design studio at Ford-owned Aston Martin – actually an unglamorous corner of a storage unit next to the Jag styling block – a small team under Callum’s watch was working on the V12-engined GT that would become the DB9, and a compact, V8-powered sports car that was, like X600, mid-engined. What if this second car could be dovetailed with the Jag for economies of scale?

Unfortunately, Jag’s car featured a transverse V6 while Aston’s had a lengthways V8, and before any cost-effective overlaps could be found between the two cars, Aston boss Ulrich Bez decided it was more appropriate for his new-gen sports car to be front-engined, triggering the redesign that led to the 2005 V8 Vantage. Jaguar would have to go it alone on its new sports car and this was poor timing because most of its engineering effort was now tied up in a late-running and over-budget project to make a brand new XJ, just as it had been in the ’80s when the first F-type began to flounder.

Worse still, Ford realised that Jag was well behind the game with then-fashionable diesel engines and had decreed that these should be its R&D spending priority. A low-volume two-seater sports car sitting on a bespoke chassis under an all-aluminium body and running its own supercharged version of the AJ-V6 engine didn’t stand a chance. In 2002 Jag’s Detroitian overlords drew a line through the X600 project for good. We wouldn’t see an F-type until Jag’s third attempt made production ten years later, long after Ford sold up.

Skip advert
Advertisement

Recommended

The FWD Chevrolet Camaro GM‑80 – dead on arrival
FWD Chevrolet Camaro GM‑80
Features

The FWD Chevrolet Camaro GM‑80 – dead on arrival

How General Motors’ performance linchpin was spared the indignity of losing drive to the rear
25 Apr 2024
Toyota 222D – dead on arrival
Toyota 222D
Features

Toyota 222D – dead on arrival

This 750bhp rallying MR2 could have seen Toyota conquer the stages, but instead fate intervened
21 Mar 2024
Chrysler ME Four-Twelve – dead on arrival
Chrysler ME Four-Twelve – front
Features

Chrysler ME Four-Twelve – dead on arrival

In 2004, Chrysler showed off a radical supercar concept with an 850bhp V12. Sadly it never came to be.
15 Feb 2024
Porsche 984 Junior – dead on arrival
Porsche 984 Junior
Features

Porsche 984 Junior – dead on arrival

This miniature marvel could have seen Porsche enter the ’90s with a truly affordable entry-level sports car
11 Jan 2024
Skip advert
Advertisement

Most Popular

New Porsche Macan Electric review – still the driver’s choice for SUVs?
Porsche Macan Electric – front
Reviews

New Porsche Macan Electric review – still the driver’s choice for SUVs?

The Porsche Macan has gone electric for its second generation – we've driven it in base form and £95k, 630bhp Turbo guise
23 Apr 2024
Abarth 124 Spider Fast Fleet test – 6 months with the Italian Mazda MX-5
Abarth 124 Spider
Long term tests

Abarth 124 Spider Fast Fleet test – 6 months with the Italian Mazda MX-5

The Italian upstart arrived with a mission to put the MX-5’s nose out of joint. After six months on evo’s Fast Fleet, did it do it?
23 Apr 2024
The MG Cyberster has gone on sale, and it costs £54,995
MG Cyberster – front
News

The MG Cyberster has gone on sale, and it costs £54,995

Two-seats, scissor doors and up to 496bhp – the MG Cyberster has finally landed, with prices starting from £54,995
25 Apr 2024