Long term tests

Mitsubishi Evo X FQ-300 SST

Dynamite around the curves but juicy and expensive for some servicing areas

You can guess what we’ve done, can’t you? A picture is worth a thousand words and all that. That’s right, we’ve replaced our (deep breath) Mitsubishi Lancer Evo X FQ‑300 GSR SST with (fill lungs again) a Mitsubishi Lancer Evo X FQ‑360 GSR.

But hang on. Haven’t we spent most of the last six months telling you that the Evo X isn’t as good as it should be? So why the hell are we swapping ours for another? Surely that’d be like having a crap holiday then going back to the same place the next year, only without the excuse that 12 months have elapsed and the bad memories have faded.

Subscribe to evo magazine

Experience the thrill of driving with evo magazine. Subscribe now and get your first 5 issues for £5 or buy the latest issue in all good newsagents!

Well, let’s pick apart what it is we have against the Evo X. One, it’s not as hardcore and frantic as the IX; two, the engine is as dull as wallpaper paste; and three, the double-clutch gearbox is a bit rubbish. Technical term that. So perhaps the manual-only FQ-360 can address the last two of those faults, and maybe the extra power will also bring back a hint of hardcore.

We can’t say for sure at the moment, because our new Evo arrived with (a very apt) 360 miles on the clock, so for the time being we’re obediently obeying the running-in instructions. One early thought, though: in this day and age fitting a five-speed gearbox to a £35,499 rally special is surely akin to Mr Boeing saying, ‘Jet engines? Pah! Propellers – that’s the future for us.’

Advertisement
Advertisement - Article continues below

Mitsubishi claims that since the five-speed manual is needed for the motorsport versions of the Evo, it wasn’t commercially viable to develop a six-speed one for the road cars, especially as the SST ’box offers six cogs if that’s what you want. This is all very well, but a close-ratio, rally-specific gearbox doesn’t sit easily with Mitsubishi’s claim to have taken the Evo upmarket. Still, let’s not judge it too hastily, even if it does have a long throw and graunches when cold…

Back to our FQ-300. WX08 HHM had covered over 10,000 tough miles before it left us, and apart from our aforementioned reservations and the occasional hum from the dash it was running perfectly sweetly, but with a check-up warning flashing every time the ignition was switched on, it was time for it to get some attention.

This is the one main advantage of the all-new 4B11 MIVEC engine – it no longer needs maintenance every 4500 miles. And nor is it so expensive when it does need a service; I was quoted £208 when I phoned Swindon’s Colt Cars Mid-West, so in it went, down I sat, and two hours later all was done. The car was even given a once-over with a jet wash, and the final bill came to £212.27 (£64.40 of which was for 5.6 litres of Shell Helix 5W-30).

It wasn’t all good news, though. While it was up on the ramps the technician let me have a poke around underneath, pointing out how tricky access to the bottom of the engine is (too many separate plastic covers, and a wide variety of different catches, screws, bolts and fasteners). He also took the trouble to show me just how few miles were left in the tyres (already known) and brake pads (more of a surprise as the stoppers still felt great underfoot).

I asked for a quote, and knew from the service manager’s expression that it wasn’t going to be good news. Then a bit of paper landed in front of me with £1371.44 scrawled on it. I asked for a breakdown, although I was busy having one of my own. £744.24 was for four 245/40 R18 Yokohama Advan A13C tyres, while getting the pads done would come in at a frankly astonishing £627.20 – a mere £135 of which would be for labour. I reckon most owners should get at least 15,000 miles from their pads, though – three trackdays and assorted road tests had taken their toll on our car’s.

It’s fuel that’s the real cost of life with the Evo, though. Petrol prices may have dropped recently, but WX08 slurped its way through £3760 of super during its time with us, averaging just 20.3mpg and frustrating everyone with its ability to parch itself in well under 200 miles. Perversely, early indications suggest the manual 360 may prove a touch more parsimonious.

Advertisement - Article continues below

Driving-wise it was hard to tell the difference between pre- and post-service FQ-300, the gearbox still hesitant at low speeds, the engine losing composure above 5800rpm. It was still dynamite around the curves, but when it left Evo Towers for the last time not a tear was shed. The FQ-360 has its work cut out.

Running Costs

Date acquiredApril 2008
Total mileage7051
Duration of test6 months
Average MPG20.3
Servicing costs£212.27 (service)
Price new£31,999
Trade in value£23,500
Depreciation£8499
Advertisement
Advertisement

Most Popular

Visit/porsche/911/201958/porsche-911-gt3-vs-gt3-rs-vs-gt2-rs-track-battle
Porsche 911

Porsche 911 GT3 vs GT3 RS vs GT2 RS - track battle

Porsche’s GT3, GT3 RS and GT2 RS are the most hardcore of the 911 breed, but pitched head‑to‑head which will we crown champion?
15 Nov 2019
Visit/buying-advice/19675/used-car-deals-of-the-week
used cars

Best used cars for sale this week

We’ve delved into the classifieds and chosen our favourite cars for sale this week
15 Nov 2019
Visit/ford/mustang/201952/ford-mustang-mach-e-uncovered-as-all-electric-suv
Ford Mustang

Ford Mustang Mach-E uncovered as all-electric SUV

The Mustang has been hit with the all-electric, SUV treatment
18 Nov 2019
Visit/features/22907/hyundai-i30-fastback-n-versus-the-col-de-turini
Hyundai i30 N hatchback

Hyundai i30 Fastback N versus the Col de Turini

We take the Hyundai i30 Fastback N up the Col de Turini, a 31km stage of the Monte Carlo World Rally Championship
19 Jul 2019