Skip advert
Advertisement

Suzuki Swift Sport – MPG and running costs

The 1.4 turbo mill is frugal on paper, even without the hybrid, which reduces tax and fuel consumption marginally

Evo rating
  • Composed chassis, decent refinement, lots of kit
  • Lacks adjustability, old-school Swift Sport character dulled

The 1.6-litre naturally-aspirated engines in Swift Sports of old were thirsty unless babied and a bit dusty at the tailpipe. The third-generation car’s 1.4-litre turbocharged unit addressed that (albeit at the expense of some personality as above).

A 135g/km figure isn’t too shabby, though the 2020 hybrid upgrade was necessary to drop that to 127g/km. Not a huge drop but Suzuki pointed out that over a year this amounts to 129kg of CO2 saving.

Advertisement - Article continues below

The hybrid is not all that much cheaper to tax than the original, at £180 per year vs £190. On paper it is a tad more efficient, however, averaging 50.4mpg vs the 2018-2020 car’s 47mpg. Being as lightweight as they are, with brakes and tyres as diminutive as they are (by comparison to some performance cars), these consumables shouldn’t cost the Earth, nor servicing.

Skip advert
Advertisement
Skip advert
Advertisement

Most Popular

Porsche ditches Bugatti as tensions with Mate Rimac come to a head
Bugatti Tourbillon – side
News

Porsche ditches Bugatti as tensions with Mate Rimac come to a head

Mate Rimac joins forces with investment firm to take full control of hypercar company
24 Apr 2026
I fell in love with the Honda Civic Type R, until it started fighting me
Civic Type R interior
Opinion

I fell in love with the Honda Civic Type R, until it started fighting me

Porter can tolerate the tsunami of active safety features, but not their inaccuracy
23 Apr 2026
Why you've probably been driving the Audi TT RS wrong this whole time
Audi TT RS fast fleet front
Long term tests

Why you've probably been driving the Audi TT RS wrong this whole time

My Audi TT RS coupe reveals its strong suit on a most unlikely road
22 Apr 2026