Skoda Rapid Spaceback review - hidden talents from value hatch?
Quietly talented hatchback offers up a better drive than you might expect
What is it?
The black sheep of the Skoda family. The Rapid Spaceback exists in a strange limbo between the similarly-styled and slightly cheaper Fabia, and the bigger-booted Rapid – which itself looks like a shrunken Octavia.
It’s pitched as a spacious, value-led family car, but sportier styling than the standard Rapid also promises a more involving drive.
Engine, transmission and 0-60mph time
A 1.2-litre, turbocharged four-cylinder is the peppiest engine you’ll find in a Spaceback if you want a manual gearbox – the available 120bhp 1.4-litre TSI is DSG-only.
Available in 85bhp and 104bhp variants, we tried the more powerful of the pair. Maximum torque of 129lb ft is developed from 1550-4100rpm. It also gets a six-speed manual gearbox to the slower car’s five-speed unit, making better use of the torque spread, and just falls short of a single-figure 0-62mph sprint with a 10.2-second time. Top speed is a respectable 120mph
Technical highlights
While the latest Fabia sits on a platform of updated Polo and MQB parts, the Spaceback makes do with a revision of that Polo platform alone.
That’s hardly a crutch on which the Spaceback has to lean, and the car’s pared-back nature means it’s commendably light – at 1095kg in 1.2 TSI manual trim, it’s only 41kg heavier than the equivalent Fabia, despite being 312mm longer and a touch wider than the supermini.
More reviews
Group tests
- Ravage Alpine A110: France's perfect sports car made even more perfect
- Alpine A390 v Hyundai Ioniq 5 N – are these EV crossovers fun as well as fast?
- Lotus Emira Turbo SE v Alpine A110 GTS – two of the last surviving mid-engined sports cars
- Ariel Atom 4R v Ariel Nomad 2 – is grip more fun than slip?
- Ariel Atom 4R v Caterham Seven ‘evo25’: power-to-weight heroes go head-to-head
- Ariel Atom 4 v Caterham Seven 310R v Lotus Elise Cup 250
- Audi Quattro, RS2 and RS3: five-cylinder icons head-to-head
- Who makes the best GT car? Aston Martin v Bentley v Maserati
- Caterham Super Seven 600 v Super Seven 2000
- Corvette Stingray v Porsche Cayman GTS v Audi R8 RWD
In-depth reviews
- Abarth 600e 2025 review – Italy gives the Alpine A290 something to worry about
- Alpine A110 review – the sports car Lotus should be building
- Alpine A390 review – Dieppe’s compelling Porsche Macan rival
- Alpine A110 R Ultime review – Ferrari money for a four-cylinder, but it might be worth it
- Aston Martin Vantage review – showing up the Porsche 911 Turbo for driving thrills
- Used Audi RS2 (1994) review – an unsung '90s hero you can own for £40k
Long term tests
- Living with the Abarth 695C, a fun Italian hot hatch that makes you feel 17 again
- My Alfa Romeo unexpectedly increases journey times, but it's far from a flaw
- Why flooring a modern classic Aston Martin for a cold start stops it from blowing up
- Our Caterham Seven is quick, but there's one thing that takes it to a new level...
- Caterham Seven evo Edition revealed – bespoke 420R joins the Fast Fleet
- Is the Cupra Leon a better hot hatch than a VW Golf GTI? I live with one
- Cupra Ateca VZN Fast Fleet test – four months with Cupra's hot crossover
- Cupra Leon Estate 310 4Drive Fast Fleet test – living with the 306bhp hot estate
- Ford Mustang GT
- Ford Mustang GT
Reviews
- Abarth 695 (2012-2024) review – why we’ll miss Italy’s Mini Cooper S rival
- Abarth 500e 2023 review
- AC Cobra 378 Superblower MkIV 2021 review – another V8 Cobra, but with a GM heart this time
- Acura Integra Type S 2024 review – a Honda Civic Type R with added restraint
- Alfa Romeo Giulia review – get one while you still can
- Alfa Romeo 33 Stradale 2025 review – a rare Italian jewel beyond compare
- Alfa Romeo SZ: history, review and specs of an icon
Suspension is by MacPherson struts at the front and torsion beam at the rear – and unlike the Fabia, there’s no lowered ‘sport’ suspension option.
What’s it like to drive?
Surprisingly, better than the newer Fabia. Most of that is down to the steering, which has some of the feedback not present in the smaller car. It’s hardly teeming with feel, but there’s enough to telegraph some information from the tyres and the drive is more satisfying as a result.
There’s not much outright grip on the 16in wheels and 215-section tyres, but the chassis balance is safe enough that the inevitable understeer can be quelled with a quick lift. The car always feels on its tip-toes and the relatively soft suspension takes just a moment to settle in corners, but the pliancy is welcome on poor surfaces.
The engine is a highlight of the package. Paired to a sweet-shifting transmission, the TSI’s low-down torque makes the car feel punchy from low revs. Long gearing removes some excitement from a straight-line dash, but the four-pot spins smoothly and there’s even gruff, sporty tone to the exhaust under heavier throttle applications.
Credit should also go to the excellent driving position. The cabin itself is unexciting, but it’s possible to sit relatively low with the wheel suitably close. The simple, glassy cabin pays dividends in terms of visibility too.
Rivals
In terms of interior volume, the Rapid Spaceback matches, and even eclipses most cars in the Focus and Golf class, but pricing is closer to Skoda’s smaller Fabia and its rivals.
It doesn’t have the fun factor of an equivalently-priced Fiesta, and can’t match a cars in the class above for performance, equipment and sophistication, but for a small subset of buyers who need supermini running costs and family car space, the Spaceback is ideal. That they’ll also find a neat chassis and willing engine is just a bonus.
Price
A Spaceback like the 1.2 TSI SE Tech test car starts at £16,340, around £400 more than the DSG-equipped Fabia we drove recently.
